Detroit: Dominion Contractor Says She Witnessed Fraudulent Actions During Ballot Counting
Judge allowed release of “report that finds intentional, systemic errors in programs designed by Dominion Voting Systems"
Dominion Voting Systems has been at the front and center of 2020 election voting fraud accusations, and a soon-to-be-released report could be the proof we have all been waiting for. On Monday, a Michigan judge allowed for the public release of a sealed forensics “report that finds intentional, systemic errors in programs designed by Dominion Voting Systems and that the errors are meant to influence election results” reports Just the News.
The analytics report in question is of the forensics findings on the Antrim County, Michigan elections, which were conducted by Allied Security Operations Group. “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results” the report concludes.
How the system works is quite genius. Instead of fraud occurring with a simple vote change to/from a candidate, “The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication” the analytics found.
With the errors come “bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail” states the report. The result: voter or election fraud. “Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan.”
The report included some eye-opening statistics. “The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity” the report concluded.
The report was conducted as the result of a lawsuit from Antrim County resident William Bailey, who charged that there were significant problems with the machines. Not only did the report substantiate Bailey’s claims, it stated, “we further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
Election Staff Can Manually Adjust Ballots During Counting with Dominion Voting Software
Judge allowed release of “report that finds intentional, systemic errors in programs designed by Dominion Voting Systems"
Dominion Voting Systems has been at the front and center of 2020 election voting fraud accusations, and a soon-to-be-released report could be the proof we have all been waiting for. On Monday, a Michigan judge allowed for the public release of a sealed forensics “report that finds intentional, systemic errors in programs designed by Dominion Voting Systems and that the errors are meant to influence election results” reports Just the News.
The analytics report in question is of the forensics findings on the Antrim County, Michigan elections, which were conducted by Allied Security Operations Group. “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results” the report concludes.
How the system works is quite genius. Instead of fraud occurring with a simple vote change to/from a candidate, “The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication” the analytics found.
With the errors come “bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail” states the report. The result: voter or election fraud. “Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan.”
The report included some eye-opening statistics. “The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity” the report concluded.
The report was conducted as the result of a lawsuit from Antrim County resident William Bailey, who charged that there were significant problems with the machines. Not only did the report substantiate Bailey’s claims, it stated, “we further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”