Edward Solomon is a data expert who made a video showing how he reversed engineered the algorithm used by Dominion and ESS which ultimately led to 200,000 votes being transferred from President Trump to Biden in Georgia.
In the video Solomon proclaims that he has signed affidavits and will appear in court to testify. He also said that he will be asking for federal protective custody.
President Trump was reportedly ahead in the 2020 election in Georgia on Election night by over 100,000 votes. But within hours his lead was diminished. It’s likely even when President Trump was hundreds of thousands of votes ahead, he had already had 200,000 votes (net) moved from his totals to Joe Biden.
Then when this was not enough to steal the election for Biden, the Democrats implemented emergency measures in Atlanta, making up a water main break story in an effort to vacate the State Farm Center where absentee ballots were being counted. Once alone, a few individuals stuck around and pulled suitcases full of ballots out from under a table and added thousands of ballots for Joe Biden to the system. Eventually the election was stolen for Biden in Georgia by 10,000 votes.
Then we were introduced to another Internet genius who took a look at the data reported from election night and using a script he developed, identified hundreds of thousands of votes moving from President Trump to Joe Biden (often times through third party candidates). These transfers occurred in every state.
Solomon’s work in Pennsylvania also showed systemic vote fraud where votes were transferred at the precinct level from President Trump to Biden.
In Georgia, Solomon says he found the smoking gun, where if you change the total votes per precinct to a uniform number such as 20,000, the percentage stays the same at 14.65%, which he says is proof that a simple linear algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.
Here are some of the comments made in reference to Solomon’s video.
Same. This is irrefutable if all the raw data is real which it appears to be. Plugging in an arbitrary number and having the % tie out is irrefutable. Statistically impossible.
— Open Minded (@pistolsout) December 6, 2020
… slack, OR ballots can be stuffed in the precinct that’s short. In other words, it’s the precinct level assigned ratios that drive the need for extra votes, not necessarily the overall statewide totals.
— Kingmaker – Big IF! (True) (@KingMakerFT) December 6, 2020
In the video below, Solomon explains in great detail everything that he did to figure out the algorithm.
Can You Hack an Election in 7 Minutes?
Can an election be hacked in seven minutes?
Andrew Appel, a professor at Princeton University set out to do just that, hack into a voting machine. In order to do this he could have tried traditional ways of hacking or writing malware to sneak on to a machine at a polling place that are left unguarded for days, but he decided it was much easier to just buy one online.
For the cost of a whole $82, Appel became the proud owner of a behemoth machine called Sequoia AVC Advantage. This machine is one of the oldest and most vulnerable in the US and is unfortunately used in places like Louisiana, New Jersey, Virginia and Pennsylvania.
No sooner did a team of bewildered deliverymen roll the 250-pound device into a conference room near Appel’s cramped, third-floor office than the professor set to work. He summoned a graduate student named Alex Halderman, who could pick the machine’s lock in seven seconds.
Clutching a screwdriver, he deftly wedged out the four ROM chips—they weren’t soldered into the circuit board, as sense might dictate—making it simple to replace them with one of his own: A version of modified firmware that could throw off the machine’s results, subtly altering the tally of votes, never to betray a hint to the voter. The attack was concluded in minutes.
To mark the achievement, his student snapped a photo of Appel—oblong features, messy black locks and a salt-and-pepper beard—grinning for the camera, fists still on the circuit board, as if to look directly into the eyes of the American taxpayer: Don’t look at me—you’re the one who paid for this thing.
Appel’s mischief might be called an occupational asset: He is part of a diligent corps of so-called cyber-academics—professors who have spent the past decade serving their country by relentlessly hacking it.
Electronic voting machines—particularly a design called Direct Recording Electronic, or DRE’s—took off in 2002, in the wake of Bush v. Gore. For the ensuing 15 years, Appel and his colleagues have deployed every manner of stunt to convince the public that the system is pervasively unsecure and vulnerable.
Beginning in the late ’90s, Appel and his colleague, Ed Felten, a pioneer in computer engineering now serving in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, marsha led their Princeton students together at the Center for Information Technology Policy (where Felten is still director).
There, they relentlessly hacked one voting machine after another, transforming the center into a kind of Hall of Fame for tech mediocrity: reprogramming one popular machine to play Pac-Man; infecting popular models with self-duplicating malware; discovering keys to voting machine locks that could be ordered on eBay.
Eventually, the work of the professors and Ph.D. students grew into a singular conviction: It was only a matter of time, they feared, before a national election—an irresistible target—would invite an attempt at a coordinated cyberattack.
There is no singular national body that regulates the security or even execution of what happens on Election Day, and there never has been. It’s a process regulated state by state.
The Princeton group has a simple message: That the machines that Americans use at the polls are less secure than the iPhones they use to navigate their way there. They’ve seen the skeletons of code inside electronic voting’s digital closet, and they’ve mastered the equipment’s vulnerabilities perhaps better than anyone (a contention the voting machine companies contest, of course).
They insist the elections could be vulnerable at myriad strike points, among them the software that aggregates the precinct vote totals, and the voter registration rolls that are increasingly digitized. But the threat, the cyber experts say, starts with the machines that tally the votes and crucially keep a record of them—or, in some cases, don’t.
Cleary hacking into voting machines is an easy task, which is a major concern for our democracy. If powerful people with money and resources want to stay in control, we now know they can make that happen very easily.
Breaking: New Lawsuit Filed By Trump Campaign in GA After Shady Ballot Counting Video Emerged
The Trump campaign has filed a new lawsuit in Georgia with new evidence that could overturn the election in the state.
New Surveillance video from the State Farm Arena in Atlanta was shown at a Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. The video shows individuals retrieving ballots from under a table and counting them after everyone was asked to leave for the night. Attorney , Jackie Pick, said no GOP poll watchers were present.
WATCH: Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes pic.twitter.com/AcbTI1pxn4
— Team Trump (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@TeamTrump) December 3, 2020
Trump Campaign lawyer, Jenna Ellis tweeted, “Huge Spike for Biden during the same time the suitcases of ballots started to be scanned. Fraud.”
Look at this picture from the Georgia video… HUGE SPIKE for Biden during the same time the suitcases of ballots started to be scanned. FRAUD. pic.twitter.com/sIbCL1yrht
— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) December 4, 2020
After the footage was released, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp called for a signature audit of votes in his state, even though State Attorney General Brad Raffensperger had already certified the election, and Georgia’s 16 votes in the electoral college, for Joe Biden.
The lawsuit, filed by the Trump campaign and Georgia GOP Chairman David Shafer, alleges that the evidence that has emerged should compel a judge to decertify the results of the presidential election.
Trump’s campaign team has argued that the election is compromised, and that the legislators should use their Article 2 powers to certify their electors for Trump.